|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 8, 2014 7:56:20 GMT 7
I remember very clear that on previous dnd editions, you cannot put bag of holding inside bag of holding. But to my amazement, the rule does not exist in Pathfinder.
The example given in.. extra dimensional space rules stated that the bag inside would be inert 'meaning you can not access them' only, not spilling out etc.
So, being a cheesy devil, I ask what would happen is we put bag inside a bag? Assuming none overloaded nor pierced.
|
|
|
|
Post by Norowas on Apr 8, 2014 12:43:30 GMT 7
|
|
yoru
New Member
Posts: 19 
|
Post by yoru on Apr 8, 2014 12:43:55 GMT 7
If it happens...
i'd say that there is a penalty for that, and that is the how much action you need to take just to take one item in the deepest bag of holding.
Like... you know... that spongebob episode where they sell chocolate... >_>b
but... my final answer will be... it all depends on the CGM... >_>b
|
|
yoru
New Member
Posts: 19
|
Post by yoru on Apr 8, 2014 12:45:57 GMT 7
... too late a few seconds... >_> hoh... kind of alike...  |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 8, 2014 12:48:49 GMT 7
Well, assuming that taking the bags from a bag is few rounds (or even minutes; doesnt matter, have time), is it possible? I still consider this as cheesy though, but if it is possible then I will gladly abuse it. (Bagception, just because I can  ) |
|
|
|
Post by Norowas on Apr 8, 2014 13:03:06 GMT 7
Well, I will say it's possible. Just ask CGM to clarify this, though. Who knows Helionster had some 'countermeasure' for something like this... We still don't know how good actually their 'security' is |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 8, 2014 13:10:13 GMT 7
I always hope CGM often visit these kind of forum/thread, and put some reply here; just to record his decision more easily. So, xamdiz ? |
|
)